|

Longman / Prentice Hall

Political Science

My Instructor Resource Center :  Log in or request access

Courts and Judicial Policymaking
Christopher P. BanksKent State University
David M. O'BrienUniversity of Virginia

ISBN-10: 0131443496
ISBN-13:  9780131443495

Publisher:  Longman
Copyright:  2008
Format:  Paper; 384 pp
Published:  12/18/2006
Status: Instock



For courses in courts and the judicial process; and law and society. The scope of its coverage, and its high academic quality, makes it attractive for graduate courses as well.

 

Christopher P. Banks and David M. O'Brien wrote Courts and Judicial Policymaking to fill a need for a comprehensive textbook on law and judicial policymaking. The text provides a fresh perspective on the contemporary politics of law, courts, the legal profession, and judicial policymaking, often with an underlying comparative judicial process perspective. It covers four distinct areas: 1) What is law?; 2) How are courts organized and how do they work procedurally?; 3) What influences court access and, ultimately, judicial decision-making?; and, 4) How do courts make policy, and how is judicial authority constrained? It has relevant and contemporary analyses of literature from the political science and legal fields; and analyses from scholars who argue from the quantitative (attitudinal and strategic models) and the qualitative (new institutionalism) perspectives. It contains up-to-date charts and graphs on the organization of courts and trends in litigation, caseloads, and opinion writing, and it is appropriate for undergraduate and graduate classes.

 

Feedback includes:

 

“The book is extremely well written and organized, one of the smoothest textbooks I have read in terms of readability. The tables provided are a major selling point for the book – nicely summarize complex and often confusing materials." – Roger Handberg, University of Central Florida

 

“The best feature of this manuscript is its thorough coverage of the subject matter as well as the in-depth analysis of specific topics and questions addressed in the boxed material and sidebars. Adding a comparative dimension by looking at the judicial systems and procedures of other countries is also quite novel.” – Susan Mezey, Loyola University, Chicago

How do you provide your students with a comprehensive treatment of key issues of judicial law and politics?

 

Extremely well-written and accessible, avoiding the dry treatment of key topics found in other texts. Students will be interested in reading their text.

 

The unique perspective of a lawyer and a political scientist. It provides an alternative to current limited judicial process texts that do not combine legal and political science approaches, that overemphasize federal courts, and that present a limited comparative judicial process analysis. Instead, Banks and O'Brien offer a fresh perspective on the contemporary politics of law, courts, the legal profession, and judicial policymaking, often with an underlying comparative judicial process perspective., and judicial policymaking, often with an underlying comparative judicial process perspective.

 

The most complete organization in the field, ranging from issues from “What is law?” to “How are courts social policymakers but constrained in making law?”  It covers four distinct areas through its organization: 1) What is law?; 2) How are courts organized and how do they  work procedurally?; 3) What influences court access and, ultimately, judicial decision-making?; and, 4) How do courts make policy; and how is judicial authority to do so limited? It has relevant and contemporary recitations of literature from the political science and legal fields; and analyses from scholars who argue from the quantitative (attitudinal and strategic models) and the qualitative (new institutionalism) perspectives.

 

Very comprehensive in substantive content, and rich in empirical data and graphs, in covering the nature of law, families of law, and jurisprudence (chapters 1 and 2); state and federal judicial organization (chapter 3);  judicial selection, retention, and removal in state and federal courts (chapter 4); legal practice and access to courts (chapters 5 and 6); adversarial justice and criminal and civil procedures, including methods of alternative dispute resolution  (chapters 7 and 8); the politics of appellate judicial decision-making and behavior (chapter 9); and the role and impact of courts in society (chapter 10). For example:

  • Courts and Judicial Policymaking provides an extensive introduction to law by analyzing the nature of law, legal systems, and legal theory (jurisprudence, such as natural law, legal positivism, legal realism, the law and economic movement, pragmatism, and and critical legal studies).
  • Courts and Judicial Policymaking has critical information about the significance of legal culture and the role lawyers play in the judicial system (chapter 5), making it an especially attractive alternative for law and society scholars.
  • Courts and Judicial Policymaking stresses the significance of the problems associated with adversarial justice and provides in-depth coverage of criminal and civil procedures, including analysis of prosecutorial discretion (chapter 7), the role of democratic juries (chapter 7), the role of courts in times of crisis, such as in fighting terrorism (chapter 7), sentencing politics (chapter 7), the nature of civil litigation/procedure (chapter 8), and alternative dispute resolution techniques (chapter 8).
  • Courts and Judicial Policymaking provides an in-depth treatment of appellate judicial policymaking behavior and how political scientists and legal scholars study them by adopting attitudinal, strategic, new institutionalism, and legal perspectives (chapter 9).
  • Courts and Judicial Policymaking contains timely discussions of the impact and limits of judicial policymaking, with coverage of the politics of educational financing, school desegregation, abortion rights, and same-sex marriage (chapter 10).


Do you engage your students in contemporary controversies over courts?

 

The text is unsurpassed in providing accessible and succinct illustrations, tables, and many cutting-edge charts and graphs on all aspects of the judicial process, caseloads, and opinion writing.

  • Throughout the chapters are two boxes, “Courts in Comparative Perspective” and “Controversies Over Courts.”  ”Courts in Comparative Perspective” boxes focus on comparative issues of law and politics not found in other texts, such as “Constitutional Courts in Europe,” “The Career Judiciary in Japan,” and “Comparative Constitutional Law and Capital Punishment.” “The Controversies Over Courts” boxes address topics such as “How Should Judges Interpret the Constitution?,” “Are State Judicial Campaigns and Elections Too Partisan?,” and “Is the Federal Judiciary Too Small to Provide Equal Access to Justice?.” 
  • Each chapter has sidebars that highlight poignant issues relating to the study of the judicial process, law, judicial politics, and social justice. For example, there are sidebars on “Researching the Law and Judicial Decisions,” “Tribal Courts,” “The Poor State of Indigent Defense Systems in the States,” and “The Battle over School Funding in the States.” 

  • Contains up-to-date charts and graphs on the organization of courts and trends in litigation, caseloads, and opinion writing.

Illustrations  

 

Tables    

 

Sidebars   

 

Section I: The Nature of Law

 

CHAPTER 1. Legal Systems and Sources of Law

 

Legal Systems             

 

            Civil Law, Common Law, Ideological Legal Systems, Religious Legal Systems, Customary and “Mixed” Legal Systems    

 

The Nature and Sources of Law          

           

            Public Law, Private Law          

 

CHAPTER 2. The Politics of Law and Jurisprudence   

 

Classical Theories of Jurisprudence      

 

            Natural Law, Legal Positivism, Sociological Jurisprudence and Legal Realism   

 

Contemporary Theories of Jurisprudence  

 

            Economics in Law and Pragmatism, Feminist Jurisprudence, Critical Legal and Race Perspectives

 

            Controversies Over Courts: How Should Judges Interpret the Constitution? 

 

The Rule of Law and the Judicial Process         

 

            In Comparative Perspective: Constitutional Courts in Europe  

 

Section II:  Court Organization and Operation       

 

CHAPTER 3. Judicial Organization, Structure, and Administration   

 

The Origins of U.S. Courts   

           

            The 1798 Judiciary Act, The Growth of the Federal Judiciary  

 

Contemporary Judicial Federalism: State and Federal Courts   

           

            State Judiciaries, The Federal Judiciary    

           

            In Comparative Perspective: Courts in South and Southeast Asia       

 

The Politics of Judicial Administration    

 

            State Court Administration, The Administration of the Federal Judiciary 

 

The Politics of Judicial Reform in the 21st Century         

 

            Controversies over Courts: Should the Public Finance State Judicial Elections?          

 

Chapter 4. Judicial Recruitment, Retention, and Removal        

 

State Judicial Selection   

 

            Controversies over Courts: Are State Judicial Campaigns and Elections Too Partisan?   

 

Federal Judicial Selection   

 

            The Framers and Judicial Selection, Ideology or Merit?, The Nomination Process, The Confirmation Process    

 

Towards A Representative Bench and a Career Judiciary?       

 

            A Representative Bench?, Leaving the Bench

           

            In Comparative Perspective: The Career Judiciary in Japan    

 

Section III: Influences on Judicial Access and Decision-Making     

 

Chapter 5. The Practice of Law    

 

The Rise of the American Legal Profession         

 

Contemporary Legal Education and Bar Admission        

 

The Business of Legal Practice    

 

            Private Practice, Government Attorneys, Corporate Legal Practice, Public Interest Lawyers and Legal Academia            

 

Access to Lawyers and Equal Justice               

 

            The Right to Counsel in Criminal Cases, Legal Representation in Civil Litigation, Government Subsidized Legal Aid, Pro Se Representation, Pro Bono Legal Services

 

Chapter 6. Access to Courts   

 

Formal Barriers           

 

Discretionary Barriers     

 

            The Law of Standing,    Mootness and Ripeness, The Political Question Doctrine          

           

            Controversies Over Courts: Is the Federal Judiciary Too Small to Provide Equal  Access to Justice?          

 

Organized Interests and Strategic Litigation      

           

            Interest Group Politics and Litigation Strategies  

           

            In Comparative Perspective: Comparative Constitutional Law and Capital Punishment      

 

Chapter 7. The Adversarial Process and Criminal Procedure 

 

The Adversarial Process    

 

            Trials: Truth or Fight Theory?   

 

Prosecutorial Discretion: From Arrest to Trial  

 

            Initial Appearance, Preliminary Hearings and Grand Jury Indictments, Formal Arraignment, Plea Bargaining 

 

The Jury’s Role    

 

            The Democratic Politics of Citizen-Juries            

 

            In Comparative Perspective: Jury Systems Around the World

 

            Controversies Over Courts: What is the Role of Courts in Times of Crisis and Wartime?        

 

The Politics of the Post-Trial Sentencing Process          

 

            The Growth of Determinate Structured Sentencing

 

Chapter 8. Civil Litigation          

 

The Civil Trial Process 

 

            The Nature of Civil Litigation, Civil Procedure  

 

            Alternative Dispute Resolution   

 

            In Comparative Perspective: Transnational Courts - Quasi-Judicial Tribunals Under NAFTA 

 

Section IV: Judicial Policymaking   

 

Chapter 9. Judicial Decision-Making and Behavior   

 

The Appellate Decision-Making Process            

            Agenda Setting, Oral Argument, Judicial Conferences, Opinion Writing  

            

            Controversies Over Courts: Should Unpublished Judicial Opinions Count as Precedents?      

 

Studying Judicial Decision-Making    

                       

            The Attitudinal Model, New Institutionalism, Strategic Choice Theory, Legal Reasoning and Interpretative Approaches, The Law and Politics of Legal Precedent

 

Statutory Interpretation

 

            Statutory Construction and Administrative Regulation  

 

Constitutional Interpretation     

 

            The Methods of Constitutional Interpretation, The Sources of Constitutional Interpretation  

 

Chapter 10.  The Scope and Limits of Judicial Power         

 

Judicial Policy-Making    

 

            State Judicial Policymaking: Equality in Educational Financing Cases, Federal Judicial Policymaking: Privacy Rights and Abortion Politics   

           

            In Comparative Perspective: The European Court of Justice and The Globalization of Judicial Power   

 

The Impact of Judicial Decisions              

 

            The Politics of Gay Rights and Same Sex Marriages: A Case Study 

 

The Limitations of Judicial Power    

 

            Internal Constraints, External Restraints

 

            Controversies Over Courts: Do Courts Forge Major Social Change?


ILLUSTRATIONS

 

3.1. The United States Court System    

 

3.2. State Court Organization    

 

3.3. California’s Unified Court System    

 

3.4. Ohio’s Non-Unified Court System     

 

3.5. Geographical Boundaries of the U.S. Court System   

 

3.6. The Organization of Judicial Administration in the United States    

 

4.1. The Nomination and Confirmation Process for Federal Judges   

 

7.1. The Stages of Trial and the Presentation of Evidence    

 

7.2. The Criminal Trial and Appeal Process    

 

8.1. The Civil Trial and Appeal Process     

 

9.1. The Process of Appellate Decision-Making     

 

9.2. Research Methodologies for Studying Judicial Politics   

 

10.1. Judicial Compliance and Impact    


TABLES

 

1.1. Major Global Legal Systems 

 

1.2. Types of Law  

 

3.1. Landmark Judicial Administration Legislation  

 

3.2. A Comparison of the State and Federal Judiciary   

 

3.3. Type of State Courts  

 

3.4. State Trial Court Docket   

 

3.5. U.S. District Court Caseload and Docket Composition, 1960-2004   

 

3.6. Nature of Civil Actions and Criminal Offenses in U.S. District Court, 2000-2004    

 

3.7. U.S. Courts of Appeals Docket Composition and Source of Appeals, 1988-2004  

 

4.1. Judicial Selection Methods in the States   

 

4.2. Federal Judicial Selection Methods During Modern Presidencies   

 

4.3. Unsuccessful U.S. Supreme Court Nominations   

 

4.4. The Duration of the Confirmation Process in Lower Federal Court Nominations     

 

4.5. Demographic Characteristics of U.S. District Court Appointees     

 

4.6. Demographic Characteristics of U.S. Court of Appeals’ Appointees    

 

4.7. Judicial Salaries of State and Federal Judges   

 

5.1. Demand for Legal Education, 1964-2005    

 

5.2. Legal Profession Occupations, By Gender and Position    

 

5.3. Top “Megafirms” in the United States    

 

5.4. Salient Differences in Legal Representation in Indigent Criminal Cases   

 

7.1. Trial Court Characteristics in Adversary and Inquisitorial Legal Systems   

 

7.2. Constitutional Protections in Criminal Cases   

 

7.3. Criminal Convictions Resulting from Trials and Pleas in State Felony Cases  

 

7.4. Sentencing Typologies and Practices   

 

8.1. Number of Tort and Contract Trials and Median Jury Awards to Plaintiffs    

 

8.2. Alternative Dispute Resolution and Settlement Practices    

 

9.1. Appeals Terminated After Oral Hearing in U.S. Courts of Appeals   

 

9.2. Types of Judicial Opinions   

 

9.3. Appeals Terminated Without Published Opinion in U.S. Courts of Appeals   

 

9.4. Select Categories of Legal or Political Variables Used to Explain or Predict Judicial Decisions   

 

9.5. Voting Alignments in the Rehnquist Court, 1986-2004  

 

9.6. Rehnquist Court Voting Blocs, By Natural Court, 1994-2004    

 

9.7. Interpretative Methods of Statutory Construction    

 

10.1. Constitutional Amendments Overturning Unpopular U.S. Supreme Court Decisions   


 

SIDEBARS

1.1. Inquisitorial and Adversarial Systems    

 

1.2. Researching the Law and Judicial Decisions   

 

3.1. Tribal Courts        

 

3.2. United States Magistrates    

 

4.1. Should Judges Make Direct Appeals to Voters During Judicial Campaigns?   

 

4.2. The Federalist Society’s Role in the Modern Confirmation Process

 

5.1. The Poor State of Indigent Defense Systems in the States  

 

6.1. The Ashwander Rules of Constitutional Avoidance

 

6.2. “Public Interest” Lawsuits in the United States and Abroad

 

7.1. Plea Bargaining Practices in the United States and Continental Europe   

 

7.2. Jury Nullification     

 

8.1. The Politics of Class Actions         

 

9.1. The U.S. Solicitor General

 

10.1. Judicial Activism and Restraint         

 

10.2. The Battle over School Funding in the States   

Pearson Higher Education offers special pricing when you choose to package your text with other student resources. If you're interested in creating a cost-saving package for your students contact your Pearson Higher Education representative.